Last weekend, my cousin’s lovely daughter, not long out of medical school, married her sweetheart - a good-looking young medical professional from an Indian household.

The Hindu wedding was magnificent, vibrant and huge fun for everyone. Watching as young English and Indian individuals danced together, I showed that the day was a best example of multicultural combination as we all wish it to be.
hud.gov
But it is precariously ignorant to take these benefits for granted and to expect that the conference of cultures will immediately lead to universal love.

The UK has perhaps the very best record of any nation in the manner in which, for hundreds of years, it has taken in immigrants and refugees from every corner of the world, providing a safe and civilised sanctuary.

From the Huguenot Protestants who ran away massacres in France throughout the 16th century, to the Jews escaping Nazi genocide during the Second World War, right approximately the Ukrainian women and children used shelter today, British tolerance and empathy have been a lifeline for millions.

Now that tolerance is being stretched to its limits. Mass migration, compounded by people-smuggling on an industrial scale, is destabilising our nation.

We need to not fall under the trap of expecting that, since it has usually exercised fine in the past, Britain can absorb any quantity of demographic modification.

We have actually never ever seen escalating migration on anything like the scale of the previous twenty years, wites Prof Robert Tombs

History shows that, even here, sudden increases of migration have triggered upheavals that last for centuries. And we have actually never ever seen intensifying immigration on anything like the scale of the previous twenty years.
justice.gov
Official figures from the Department for Education revealed on Thursday that white British kids are currently the minority in one in 4 schools in England.

This change has actually been specifically marked in our huge cities. At Rockwood Academy in Birmingham, for example, there was not a single white British student taped amongst the 1,084 who go to the school.

Last week likewise saw the publication of a report from Professor Matt Goodwin at Buckingham University, forecasting that white Britons will be a minority of the population by 2063 - barely more than a single generation.

By the end of the century, according to his figures, 60 percent of the country will have been born overseas or will have at least one moms and dad who is an immigrant. Already, more than 19 percent of Britons will be Muslim (compared with the existing 7 per cent). Goodwin’s projections are based upon census data and figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

I suspect these numbers severely ignore the true rate of modification. They presume a steady influx and stable geopolitical conditions, when we have every factor to expect both of those elements will prove volatile.

An anti-immigration protester holds up a placard during a demo in Dover in 2020

Climate change could have a terrible result on migration, if even a couple of of the more alarmist theories are borne out.

Tens of millions of people in low-lying countries such as Bangladesh could be made homeless if water level increase. Millions more would leave their homes if glacial melt in the Himalayas triggered catastrophic flooding in India.

Civil wars in Sudan, Congo and Eritrea have currently driven enormous numbers of people to cross the Mediterranean into Europe. African countries from Nigeria to South Africa remain in risk of tearing themselves apart, and the outcome would be an enormous rush of individuals seeking to leave the fighting.

These upheavals would be minor compared with the aftermath of war between India and Pakistan, or in the Middle East. In those cases, Europe might see 100 million refugees or more.

Contribute to that the increase of organised criminal offense and individuals trafficking. For all Sir Keir Starmer’s bluster about ‘smashing the gangs’, he closes his eyes to the reality that this is a multi-billion-pound service - one that will not cease even if he makes speeches.

These are not minor lawbreakers. They are global cartels, who have actually found a profits stream that measures up to make money from the drugs trade. The Government has no ideas at all about how to stop them.

The varieties of economic migrants making the dangerous crossing from France in overloaded dinghies are installing, in some cases topping more than 1,000 in a single day.

The cumulative effect is mind-boggling. According to your house of Commons library, 44,000 people showed up illegally in the 12 months to March - which figure, obviously, represents only the people we understand about. Much more have most likely slipped under the radar, landing unnoticed or concealed in trucks and containers.

But 44,000 equates to simply 5 per cent of the migration overall for the year. Legal arrivals surpass the illegal ones by about 20-to-one.

Nothing in our long and interesting island story has ever come close to this. Mass immigration, introduced by New Labour under Tony Blair, is a careless experiment in market revolution that has never ever been attempted in Britain before.

But it has actually occurred somewhere else. And for indigenous populations, it has actually typically been devastating.

When Europeans settled in the Americas, from the 16th century, they forced their method on to the land. In Australia and New Zealand - countries that were much less densely populated - there was less large-scale violence however the result on the aboriginal people was no less disastrous.

Significantly, the British Empire never enabled migration to India, which had actually a big settled population. British subjects were encouraged to settle only in sparsely peopled locations: for example, Canada and wide-open parts of Africa such as Kenya.

But in every case, once this procedure began, it was quickly uncontrollable. More than 6 million Irish emigrants arrived in the US throughout the 19th century, a third of them in the space of less than a decade from 1845.

Almost as many Italians emigrated to America, many of them in between 1880 and the early 1920s. In a nation riven with racial departments, the Italian and Irish neighborhoods combated to endure, often obviously by effort, however likewise by political corruption and organised crime.

Starry-eyed Left-wingers like to claim that Britain too is a ‘country of immigrants’. That’s utterly disingenuous.

William the Conqueror, who got here throughout the Channel in 1066 with his own flotilla of boats, brought just about 7,000 guys. Yet that small army and the French-speaking Norman immigrants who followed ruined the native Anglo-Saxon culture and subjugated a whole individuals.

Almost every big Saxon structure was destroyed, the judgment elite was replaced, their residential or commercial property took and the language changed beyond recognition. For centuries, Saxons were forced to labour as serfs, disliked as an inferior race by the colonising elite. Even Saxon saints were demoted.

It took at least 400 years for the aftershocks of the Norman invasion to go away.

Resentments ran so deep they are still visible in our folk legends: Robin Hood was envisioned as a Saxon knight fighting Norman injustice. The idea of this ‘Norman Yoke’ inspired democrats well into the reign of Victoria.

Even today, nearly a thousand years later on, the Conquest might be embedded in our class system.

A 2011 study discovered that Britons with names showing Norman descent - such as Mandeville, Lacy, Glanville or Percy - were on average 10 percent much better off than those with Saxon craftsmen names such as Smith, Cooper, Baker or Shepherd, almost a millennium after the Battle of Hastings.

To understand completely how terribly harmed a country can be by unrestrained immigration, we need just look at Northern Ireland. During the 17th century, 10s of thousands of Scottish protestants migrated to Ulster. Though separated by the Irish Sea, these two countries are so close that on a clear day they are noticeable to each other.

This was a state job, initiated by the Scottish and English federal governments during James I’s reign, and conceived as a method of ending mass poverty in Scotland by motivating people to live by farming in Ireland.

Well, all of us know the outcome: it caused enmity and violence still common today that has actually seen thousands eliminated over the centuries.

Not all the social inequality in Britain is the result of the Norman intrusion, naturally, anymore than all Ireland’s Troubles were the repercussion of a strategy to ease starvation in Scotland.

But when problems have complicated causes, individuals seek easy scapegoats - and immigration will constantly provide one.

The is now 69.5 million, according to the ONS. (Many think it to be

significantly higher). That’s a boost of 10 million this century. Yet the birth rate is falling: in 2023 it reached its most affordable rate on record in England and Wales, at 1.44 kids per lady, compared with the ‘replacement rate’ of 2.1 - the number of children needed to keep numbers consistent.

If our growing population is not due to giving birth, it should be driven by immigration.

The falling birth rate is not a brand-new phenomenon. In 1938, it was forecasted that the UK population would peak within five years at 41 million, and that it would then fall steadily for the next 3 decades, to 31 million by 1975.

In the occasion, this ended up being nonsense, partly due to the fact that the official statistics did not expect the Second World War and the child boom that followed.

But the forecasts also failed to appraise the beginnings of immigration from former nests, with many thousands showing up from the West Indies after 1948 - the ‘Windrush generation’ - and Pakistan and India following self-reliance and partition in 1947.

There were other surges, for instance from East Africa after the increase of the despot Idi Amin who expelled 80,000 Ugandan Asians, among them the moms and dads of former Home Secretary Priti Patel.

Crucially, the great majority of these immigrants were identified to integrate into British life. If not already English-speaking, they discovered the language. They looked for work or started services. Many brought much needed skills and dynamism.

But that is not the case today. A high percentage of legal immigrants concern do low-paid work, for example in care homes and the hospitality sector. Those who qualify under the government visa plan for experienced employees or health and care employees can expect to be paid 80 per cent of the basic salary.

Those in the fishing industry, for instance, receive ₤ 12.82 an hour, rather than ₤ 15.88 for British workers. A comparable inconsistency applies in numerous trades from welding to dance and choreography.

When will white Brits end up being an ethnic minority? Map exposes areas where they already are

This has a threefold impact: salaries are depressed, brand-new arrivals reside in relative hardship, and many British people have actually left of the labour market. Resentments grow on all sides and the expense is unsustainable.

Many other migrants, it needs to be stated, maximize our generous asylum system - consisting of housing (in some cases in comfy hotels), food, complimentary NHS healthcare and even spending cash.

The greatest source of resentment, though, comes when immigrants refuse to incorporate. Incredibly, many on the Left encourage this by trashing our culture and libelling our history - elevating every background other than the native one. It spells disaster for our future when immigrants are motivated to remain locked within their own communities and taught that the British have actually constantly been their enemies.

How dangerous this is, we can see by looking throughout the Channel, to France where second and third generation immigrants from North Africa develop a consistent state of unrest. Riots are frequent, car-burning is a nationwide sport and extremist politicians talk of’re-migration’ - the expulsion of individuals who ‘do not fit in’.

This will be Britain’s future if the Government does not take control of the circumstance right now. Immigration can benefit everybody, but only if it is strictly handled, democratically accepted and culturally incorporated.

Allowed to run out of control, as the arc of history shows, it ruins countries.

Professor Robert Tombs is the author of The English And Their History

FranceIndia